An abstracts system that reviewers and submitters love to use
We broke down the call for abstracts into three stages. First, your event's potential speakers submit their documents.
Second, your organization's reviewers evaluate the submissions based on your organization's criteria.
Forget about manually entering call for conference abstracts data into spreadsheets, sending a thousand emails, and filling your desk with a million sticky notes. Everything submitted to the Abstract Scorecard is collected and stored on our secure servers, in the cloud. You have instant access to the system anytime, anywhere.
CadmiumCD's Abstract Scorecard is an easy-to-use conference abstracts collection software with three distinct stages. The Abstract Scorecard simplifies the conference abstracts submission process for potential speakers, creates an organized and easy way for reviewers to evaluate the submissions, and generates comparisons based on your organization's criteria that make selecting the final manuscripts easy.
We know you don't just do conference abstracts. That's why the Abstract Scorecard is customizable. Collect, review, and select a variety of data the way you think is best. The most popular options beside calls for papers are award selections, grant applications, and poster collections. Get in touch to find out how the Abstract Scorecard can work with your specific needs.
The Abstract Scorecard is only step one in the world's most powerful meeting management system. Anything you collect in the Scorecard can be integrated with the Conference Harvester® speaker & exhibitor management tool, as well as CadmiumCD's eventScribe® event technology. Get in touch to find out about all our products and how they'll work for your total conference experience.
CadmiumCD created the Abstract Scorecard to help event planners manage the submission, review, selection, and scheduling process for conference abstracts, awards, and grants. The Abstract Scorecard will allow you to toss spreadsheets aside and make managing your conference abstracts a breeze.
WOW. Very nice format. Easy to see where i was at in the process. Standard layout of the proposal was helpful. Objectively driven questions for assessment. Would have helped to have the conference themes re-listed on the side. The binary 0-1 was hard, too. If they met it at all, i graded as a 1. Would have put the takeaways at the end...we don't know what those will be until after we read the body of work. it was a little distracting. i kept reading past them and then going back to the top.
This tool is an excellent evolution for the Excel spreadsheets we have used in past reviews.
Very simple process, very visual, the review tool at the end was great to compare results. I recommend to keep using it.