An abstracts system that reviewers and submitters love to use
We broke down the call for abstracts into three stages. First, your event's potential speakers submit their documents.
Second, your organization's reviewers evaluate the submissions based on your organization's criteria.
Forget about manually entering call for conference abstracts data into spreadsheets, sending a thousand emails, and filling your desk with a million sticky notes. Everything submitted to the Abstract Scorecard is collected and stored on our secure servers, in the cloud. You have instant access to the system anytime, anywhere.
CadmiumCD created the Abstract Scorecard to help event planners manage the submission, review, selection, and scheduling process for conference abstracts, awards, and grants. The Abstract Scorecard will allow you to toss spreadsheets aside and make managing your conference abstracts a breeze.
The Abstract Scorecard is only step one in the world's most powerful meeting management system. Anything you collect in the Scorecard can be integrated with the Conference Harvester® speaker & exhibitor management tool, as well as CadmiumCD's eventScribe® event technology. Get in touch to find out about all our products and how they'll work for your total conference experience.
CadmiumCD's Abstract Scorecard is an easy-to-use conference abstracts collection software with three distinct stages. The Abstract Scorecard simplifies the conference abstracts submission process for potential speakers, creates an organized and easy way for reviewers to evaluate the submissions, and generates comparisons based on your organization's criteria that make selecting the final manuscripts easy.
We know you don't just do conference abstracts. That's why the Abstract Scorecard is customizable. Collect, review, and select a variety of data the way you think is best. The most popular options beside calls for papers are award selections, grant applications, and poster collections. Get in touch to find out how the Abstract Scorecard can work with your specific needs.
I've done several abstract reviews in the past and this has been [by far] the most logical easily accessible process yet. kudos. they were a pleasure to review and the technology was great!
I really liked this so much better than the prior platform. I felt the information was so much easier to access and to read! Scoring was easy. Just a great way to review nominations and score.
System works well. Spellcheck is a bit awkward but at least it works. The ability to toggle back and forth easily is a great benefit. This is the best tool of the three years I have been on the jury.