Call for papers digitally with the Abstract Scorecard conference software
Besides being an intuitive abstract management system that makes collecting and reviewing abstracts quick and painless, the Abstract Scorecard is also a powerful data collection tool. Optional features such as copyright agreement forms, disclosure collections, and file uploads, position the Scorecard as your all-in-one meeting management system.
The abstract submission experience can by modified with a variety of options in the software. Select which informational fields and types of submissions will be displayed. And the Scorecard isn't only an abstract collection tool. Biographies, posters, and papers are just a few of the many possibilities.
Every submission process is unique. With the Abstract Scorecard, you can customize your review questions based on your organization's specific goals.
A grading sheet for scoring abstracts helps reviewers judge each abstract objectively and is clearly displayed alongside the presenter biography and session information.
Administrators in the Abstract Scorecard collection tool can break up the workload between multiple reviewers, segmenting the reviews into different groups based on reviewer expertise.
Sometimes there are issues submitting on time. CadmiumCD understands that, so we made it possible to unlock the process in the abstract management system after the deadline for specified users.
Reviewers can be designated as 'blind' for complete neutrality. With this option, author information is hidden in the abstract software and reviews are specific to submissions only.
Reviewers can disclose any perceived conflicts of interest and opt out of reviewing submissions based on these in the abstract scoring software system.
When reviewers enter the abstract scoring page, there is limited navigation. They have a forward, back, and home button, but the rest of the page is designed to keep them focused on the task at hand. There is also a button in the abstract tool they can use to review a list of all the reviews they've been assigned. They can see the score they gave, which abstracts they rejected or accepted, and how many reviews they have left to go.
Your reviewers can see the average score they've given to all their reviews in comparison to the scores they've given specific reviews. This will help them properly determine which abstracts to accept and reject. Administrators can see not only how many reviews are incomplete and complete in the abstract scoring software tool, they can also view login statistics and which types of tasks were performed during those logins, along with a variety of other data.
With the Abstract Scorecard abstract management software you don't have to manually enter all your review data into a spreadsheet. The system will do it for you!
You get an online dashboard in the abstract tool that allows you to visualize quick stats including reviewer logins, completed reviews, and cutoff deadlines.
Access a breakdown of completed abstract reviews complete with reviewer comments and averaged scores in the abstract scoring system. Accept or reject abstracts instantly using a drop-down menu.
The Abstract Scorecard software system doesn't just do call for papers and abstract management. Collect posters, review grant proposals, score award submissions, and so much more. Streamline your organization's collection & review processes for any type of documents!
System made it really easy to work through the abstracts and saved me many many hours compared with earlier systems. I appreciate it!!!
It was my pleasure to review scientific research abstracts of my expertise. The current Abstract Score Card is well defined and ease of rating. If some changes will required in future, will definitely share with you. Thanks and Regards, Dr. Jitendra Amrutkar
This system is excellent for reading and reviewing sessions! One thing I noticed is that some groups added additional information in regards to speaker qualifications whereas others just included the speakers affiliation. Perhaps the submission system could be modified such that all groups have equal opportunity to submit relevant information.